Fact Based List:
UnitedHealth Group: Comparison of 6 Quality Metrics for Global Capitation vs. Fee-for-Service
Submitted by Charlene Ice on Thu, 08/13/2020 - 11:39
- Breast cancer screening rate: global capitation 80% vs. FFS 74%
- Colorectal cancer screening rate: global capitation 82% vs. FFS 74%
- Controlled blood sugar levels: global capitation 89% vs. FFS 80%
- Eye exams: global capitation 84% vs. FFS 74%
- Functional status assessment rate: global capitation 96% vs. FFS 86%
- Medication review: global capitation 97% vs. FFS 92%
Notes: Global capitation pays a set amount per month per patient. The study used metrics from the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) related to preventive care and chronic conditions.
Source: UnitedHealth Group Press Release, August 11, 2020
Source URL: https://www.unitedhealthgroup.com/newsroom/2020/uhg-study-sh...
List Ratings: |
Lists You Might Also Be Interested In
- State Health Care Cost Containment Commission: Recommendations for States to Improve Quality, Reduce Cost
- 5 Initiatives to Improve Health Equality in the U.S.: percentage with initiative in place
- Nicola Hawkinson: 5 Ways To Maintain Cost, Quality And Patient Satisfaction Post Healthcare Reform
- Andis Robeznieks: CMS 2018 Quality Payment Program -3 things to like
- 4 Policy Steps Doctors Deem Important to Improve Outcomes, Ensure Quality
Login or register to post comments