Fact Based List:
MedPAC: 6 issues that need to be resolved if two-sided ACOs are going to be part of the Medicare program in the long term
Submitted by Charlene Ice on Mon, 06/25/2018 - 11:33
- Are hospitals viable participants in ACOs?
- Should asymmetric models be continued?
- How should benchmarks be set initially and rebased for subsequent agreement periods?
- Should the 5 percent bonus for clinicians in advanced alternative payment models (A–APMs) be distributed differently to encourage A–APM participation?
- What will be the relationship between specialists and two-sided ACOs?
- Are two-sided ACOs a long-term option in the Medicare program?
Notes: from "REPORT TO THE CONGRESS: Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System," Chapter 8
Source: MedPAC, June 2018
Source URL: http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/reports/jun18_medp...
List Ratings: |
Lists You Might Also Be Interested In
- CMS 2023 Proposed Rule: 4 Criteria that an ACO Must Meet to Receive Advance Investment Payments
- AJMC: 5 Characteristics Associated with Patients Remaining in an ACO for 24 Months or More
- Sanjay Seth, MD: 4 Proactive Outreach Tactics for ACOs to Consider, Using Telehealth
- Hays Green: 5 steps to solid infrastructure for ACO goals
- When Stakeholders Estimate ACOs will Have a Material Impact in Their Marketplace
Login or register to post comments